Biomedical Science & Research Journals



The American Journal of Biomedical Science and Research has set the following guideline to streamline the process of reviewing and to ensure quality content is published on this journal. The peer review process is carried out in complete discretion where the reviewer and the authors’ identities are kept hidden so as to not create any scope for discrimination and prejudice of any kind.
The peer review process is integral to publishing. We believe that the integrity of the peer review system is what upholds the quality of the content produced on the journal.

Peer review criteria for manuscript evaluation

  • Peer reviewers are expected to follow these guidelines to ensure high quality literature is produced and manuscripts are enhanced.
  • Articles submitted to the journal for publishing must be original and unique. The same results or insights should not be available anywhere else. Reviewers must beware of duplicate submissions, previously rejected work or authors and manuscripts that are not in the scope of this journal.
  • Reviewers must understand and digest the standards set for publishing by the journal in order to better review articles and see if they hold up to said standards.
  • With every published article, the expectation of the journal for better quality of content goes up. Continuously improving content is expected for publishing.
  • There should be current and future relevance of the topic submitted for review.

Reviewer’s roles and responsibilities during the peer review process

  • Put down your views regarding the quality and the presentation of the content and provided suggests for improvement of sections you feel can be upgraded.
  • Outline the strength and the weaknesses of every manuscript.
  • Suggest areas of improvement, let the author know what he can change or enhance to improve the quality of the article.
  • If you deem a manuscript unworthy of publishing, explain the reasons for rejection and how you arrived to the said conclusion.
  • Reviewers are expected to maintain the confidentiality of the literature they receive for review, throughout the peer review process, right up until publication.
  • Even after publication, reviewers are allowed to refer to the published data only and not the content that they received previously in the form of drafts, during the peer review process.

Information apart from the published content, which may have been received previously can be used only after getting permission from the author.

Reviewers are expected to be fair and impartial. Discrimination of any kind will not be tolerated by the journal
Reviewers are also expected to uphold the deadlines set for peer review and decision-making.

The peer review process is a vital part of the publishing of open source content. We have a created a process we trust so as to produce high quality, unique content that is engaging and accurate.
For More information: biomedical open access Journals: https://biomedgrid.com/
                                  https://biomedgrid.com/reviewer-guidelines.php

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biomedical Science and Research Journals | Simulation Programs in Disaster Medicine

Image
  Simulation Programs in Disaster Medicine Introduction The Significance Soft Abilities in the services of disaster medicine Soft skills are characterized as the individual qualities that empower a person to communicate adequately and harmoniously with others in stuff conditions and are fundamental for effective execution in any relational setting. According to Abbas [ 1 ] these properties are much more pivotal in the medical services industry of disaster medicine and not only, where therapeutic experts and representatives more nearly collaborate with patients and different human groups, as a rule under to great degree troublesome and passionate conditions. Accordingly, people work in disaster medicine issues should completely screen work possibility to guarantee they have the delicate aptitudes required to convey an outstanding level of care and administration to patients, while additionally having the capacity to effectively team up with staff individuals to boost hierarchical vi...
Read more

Biomedical Science and Research Journals | Phosphatidylethanol (PEth); the Superior Direct Alcohol Biomarker against Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) and Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin (CDT)

Image
Phosphatidylethanol (PEth); the Superior Direct Alcohol Biomarker against Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) and Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin (CDT) Editorial As ethanol itself is metabolised and excreted quickly from the body, assessing alcohol consumption with a blood test relies on other markers indicative of consumption. Traditional tests include Liver Function Testing (LFT), Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin (CDT) Testing, and a Full Blood Count (FBC). Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) testing, on the other hand, is a direct biomarker of alcohol consumption, can only be detected when alcohol has been consumed, and is directly correlated with the level of alcohol consumed There are some difficulties when testing alcohol in blood to determine if alcohol had been abused. Due to these challenges in testing alcohol consumption behaviours across society, in the most recent decade...
Read more

Biomedical Science and Research Journals | The Effect of User Charges on the Pattern of Health Care Demand in Nigeria

Image
  The Effect of User Charges on the Pattern of Health Care Demand in Nigeria Abstract The economic downturn in early 1980s in Nigeria led to the introduction and implementation of user charges in government health care facilities. This coupled with the persistent poverty level in Nigeria raises the question of consumers’ ability and willingness to pay these user charges. Accordingly, using primary data, this study examined the possible trade-off between user charges and demand for government health services in Nigeria. The analysis showed that increasing user fees substantially reduced the use of government health facility by low-income earners. Thus, it was recommended, among others, that government should introduce price discrimination into user fees, to be set at marginal cost. This would help avoid the adverse distribution effects of user-fees, especially, on the lower income group. Keywords:  User Charges; Demand for government health services; Willingness to pay and Heal...
Read more